This week’s news of interim results from the ENDEAVOR trial, a head-to-head comparison of “real world” schedules of Kyprolis versus Velcade, reveals an impressive benefit of carfilzomib over bortezomib in relapsed myeloma. Indeed, the 929-patient phase III trial showed a progression-free survival (PFS) of 18.7 months for Kyprolis versus 9.4 months for Velcade—basically a doubling of PFS or remission duration.

In the ENDEAVOR trial, Kyprolis was given in the usual schedule of two IV infusions per week for three out of four weeks, with dose escalation to 56 mg/m2. Velcade was also given according to the standard schedule, with subcutaneous (versus IV) administration allowed at the discretion of the investigator. (Sub-Q administration occurred more than 75 percent of the time.)

The results in this large trial follow on the heels of the impressive results in the 792-patient ASPIRE trial, which showed the superiority of Kyprolis plus Revlimid/Dexamethasone (Rd) over Rd alone. A head-to-head comparison of Kyprolis versus Velcade in the frontline setting is ongoing in a trial by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG). Impressive results with the Kyprolis/Rd combination in the high-risk smoldering myeloma (HR - SMM) setting were presented at the 2014 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology (ASH).

A strong case is emerging to place Kyprolis within the treatment paradigm for myeloma. One must applaud Onyx/Amgen for the direct comparison trials, which allow assessment of both efficacy and toxicity (concerns over which hampered panobinostat’s initial approval in 2014). In the case of Kyprolis, although there are some increased toxicities versus Velcade—including cardiac and renal issues as well as dyspnea and hypertension—these certainly do not preclude use of the drug with normal cautions. Although oral formulations of both Kyprolis and Velcade are in development, it seems their primary role will be in the ongoing therapy or maintenance settings.

Kyprolis is already under review by the FDA in the one-to-three relapse setting based upon the ASPIRE trial results. Future reviews will likely consider the other settings in which Kyprolis can add value—from HR-SMM, frontline, and early relapse to the already approved relapsed/refractory situation. The increases in both depth and length of remissions are definitely important. The twice-weekly IV schedule is a challenge for patients and there is much interest in the ongoing once-weekly schedule study results.

Full data from the ENDEAVOR trial will be submitted for presentation at the 2015 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting. In the meantime, this important emerging option is great news for patients. As always, it takes time to determine the best new treatment paradigm—but head-to-head comparison data help considerably. Stay tuned for what will be many updates to come.

Dr. Durie sincerely appreciates and reads all comments left here. However, he cannot answer specific medical questions and encourages readers to contact the trained IMF InfoLine staff instead. Specific medical questions posted here will be forwarded to the IMF InfoLine. Questions sent to the InfoLine are answered with input from Dr. Durie and/or other scientific advisors and IMWG members as appropriate, but will not be posted here. To contact the IMF InfoLine, call 800-452-CURE, toll-free in the US and Canada, or send an email to [email protected]. InfoLine hours are 9 am to 4 pm PT. Thank you.


Please define "relapse" in the context of this trial. It seems to be a difficult to define concept for patients to understand. Is there a number at which the M-spike is a critical mass? Or a ratio of kappa/lambda light chains that must be reached? I am seven years along, on Velcade/dex, stable for the most part, but the numbers keep creeping up, slowly and surely. My only distinct symptom is anemia. Do I wait for bone involvement or kidney issues? What is a relapse?

Thank you,


Add new comment